ApprovalMax

Benchmark report 2026

The nonprofit control benchmark

Inside the approval controls of 250 nonprofits in the US and Canada.

A volunteer and a child bump fists at a community distribution event
Photo: Claudia Raya, Unsplash
Cover of The nonprofit control benchmark, ApprovalMax benchmark report 2026

Inside financial control at North American nonprofits

The report looks at how nonprofit finance teams in the US and Canada have their approvals configured, and at how those approvals are then used month to month. It covers approval thresholds, budget checking, restricted fund handling and board involvement, setting the sector against comparison groups in other industries.

It's a study of how approvals are set up and used inside ApprovalMax, not a review of anyone's accounting records.

250nonprofit customers
777,729bills examined
US & Canadacoverage

What you will find inside

Six areas of approval control, with the figures behind each one and how they shift with the size and type of organization.

Approval thresholds

How many people sign off a bill, whether that number rises with the value of the bill, and what happens in organizations that have never set a threshold.

Budget checks

The four ways to check a bill against a budget at the point of approval, and how many of the 250 organizations use any of them.

Who approves what

How the approver changes with the type of nonprofit, and why a congregation and a grant-making foundation sit at opposite ends of the same sector.

The sector in context

How nonprofit approval controls compare with a much larger group of construction firms, and where the sector is stronger than its reputation suggests.

Restricted funds

How widely fund structure is held, how often bills are coded to it, and how rarely it is used to decide who approves.

Board involvement

How often a board member actually appears as an approver on a bill, set against the governance role boards are given on paper.

Also inside

What weak controls cost

The single audit threshold, repeat audit findings, funder due diligence, and what Form 990 Part VI asks you to state in public.

Fraud in context

Figures from the ACFE 2026 report, set against what the approval data shows about how nonprofits actually work.

A five-step ladder

Five steps to deeper control, in the order the data suggests organizations tend to take them.

An eight-question checklist

A month-end checklist for your own approvals, written to be used on its own without the rest of the report.


Where the data comes from

This is a study of how approvals are set up and used inside ApprovalMax.

What we looked at

  • Product usage data from 250 nonprofit customers in the US and Canada.
  • 777,729 bills that passed through their approval workflows.
  • How each organization has its approvals configured.
  • How those approvals are used in practice, rather than how they were designed.

What we did not look at

  • No accounting records, ledgers or financial statements were examined.
  • No individual organization is named or identifiable in the report.
  • No audit, opinion or assessment of any organization's finances is offered.
  • Figures are reported as group averages and shares, with the base stated each time.
“ApprovalMax lends that level of control and accountability to give us documentation in black and white, through the audit trail, that we can show an auditor.”

Stephanie Cooper, Controller at CHARITYacCOUNTS!
30+ staff supporting 60+ North American charities

3.8 dayssaved per client each month
1,800transactions a month
20charity clients

Compare your own approvals against 250 nonprofits

Download the benchmark report, then use the eight-question checklist at the back on your own month end.